BDM | 重建体外人类肠道微生物群模型的设计和方法

上下滑动以阅览

1. Rowland I, Gibson G, Heinken A et al (2018) Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur J Nutr 57:1–24. /10.1007/s00394-017-1445-8

2. Steer T, Carpenter H, Tuohy K et al (2000) Perspectives on the role of the human gut microbiota and its modulation by pro- and prebiotics. Nutr Res Rev 13:229–254. /10.1079/095442200108729089

3. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA et al (2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027–1031. /10.1038/nature05414

4. Rajilić-Stojanović M, Biagi E, Heilig HGHJ et al (2011) Global and deep molecular analysis of microbiota signatures in fecal samples from patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 141:1792–1801. /10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.043

5. Dicksved J, Halfvarson J, Rosenquist M et al (2008) Molecular analysis of the gut microbiota of identical twins with Crohn’s disease. ISME J 2:716–727. /10.1038/ismej.2008.37

6. Schroeder BO, Bäckhed F (2016) Signals from the gut microbiota to distant organs in physiology and disease. Nat Med 22:1079–1089. /10.1038/nm.4185

7. Cryan JF, O’riordan KJ, Cowan CSM et al (2019) The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev 99:1877–2013. /10.1152/physrev.00018.2018

8. Kostic AD, Howitt MR, Garrett WS (2013) Exploring host-microbiota interactions in animal models and humans. Genes Dev 27:701–718. /10.1101/gad.212522.112

9. Uzbay T (2019) Germ-free animal experiments in the gut microbiota studies. Curr Opin Pharmacol 49:6–10. /10.1016/j.coph.2019.03.016

10. Al-Asmakh M, Zadjali F (2015) Use of germ-free animal models in microbiota-related research. J Microbiol Biotechn 25(10):1583–1588. /10.4014/jmb.1501.01039

11. Pearce SC, Coia HG, Karl JP et al (2018) Intestinal in vitro and ex vivo models to study host-microbiome interactions and acute stressors. Front Physiol 9:1584. /10.3389/fphys.2018.01584

12. Jones RB, Zhu X, Moan E et al (2018) Inter-niche and inter-individual variation in gut microbial community assessment using stool, rectal swab, and mucosal samples. Sci Rep 8:4139. /10.1038/s41598-018-22408-4

13. Tang Q, Jin G, Wang G et al (2020) Current sampling methods for gut microbiota: a call for more precise devices. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:151. /10.3389/fcimb.2020.00151

14. Booijink CCGM, El-Aidy S, Rajilić-Stojanović M et al (2010) High temporal and inter-individual variation detected in the human ileal microbiota. Environ Microbiol 12:3213–3227. /10.1111/J.1462-2920.2010.02294.X

15. Petrof EO, Gloor GB, Vanner SJ et al (2013) Stool substitute transplant therapy for the eradication of Clostridium difficile infection: 'RePOOPulating’ the gut. Microbiome 1:3. /10.1186/2049-2618-1-3

16. Krause JL, Schaepe SS, Fritz-Wallace K et al (2020) Following the community development of SIHUMIx—a new intestinal in vitro model for bioreactor use. Gut Microbes 11:1116–1129. /10.1080/19490976.2019.1702431

17. Lawson CE, Harcombe WR, Hatzenpichler R et al (2019) Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:725–741. /10.1038/s41579-019-0255-9

18. Schäpe SS, Krause JL, Engelmann B et al (2019) The simplified human intestinal microbiota (SIHUMIx) shows high structural and functional resistance against changing transit times in in vitro bioreactors. Microorganisms 7:641. /10.3390/microorganisms7120641

19. Ito T, Sekizuka T, Kishi N et al (2019) Conventional culture methods with commercially available media unveil the presence of novel culturable bacteria. Gut Microbes 10:77–91. /10.1080/19490976.2018.1491265

20. Bonnet M, Lagier JC, Raoult D et al (2020) Bacterial culture through selective and non-selective conditions: the evolution of culture media in clinical microbiology. New Microbes New Infect 34:100622. /10.1016/j.nmni.2019.100622

21. Tidjani Alou M, Naud S, Khelaifia S et al (2020) State of the art in the culture of the human microbiota: new interests and strategies. Clin Microbiol Rev 34(1):e00129-19. /10.1128/CMR.00129-19

22. Kim BS, Kim JN, Cerniglia CE (2011) In vitro culture conditions for maintaining a complex population of human gastrointestinal tract microbiota. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:838040. /10.1155/2011/838040

23. Li L, Zhang X, Ning Z et al (2018) Evaluating in vitro culture medium of gut microbiome with orthogonal experimental design and a metaproteomics approach. J Proteome Res 17:154–163. /10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00461

24. Yousi F, Kainan C, Junnan Z et al (2019) Evaluation of the effects of four media on human intestinal microbiota culture in vitro. AMB Expr 9:69. /10.1186/s13568-019-0790-9

25. Thursby E, Juge N (2017) Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J 474:1823–1836. /10.1042/BCJ20160510

26. Duncan SH, Louis P, Thomson JM et al (2009) The role of pH in determining the species composition of the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol 11:2112–2122. /10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01931.x

27. Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK (2015) Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:20–32. /10.1038/nrmicro3552

28. Espey MG (2013) Role of oxygen gradients in shaping redox relationships between the human intestine and its microbiota. Free Radic Biol Med 55:130–140. /10.1016/J.FREERADBIOMED.2012.10.554

29. Haindl R, Schick S, Kulozik U (2021) Influence of cultivation pH on composition, diversity, and metabolic production in an in vitro human intestinal microbiota. Fermentation 7:156. /10.3390/fermentation7030156

30. Zihler Berner A, Fuentes S, Dostal A et al (2013) Novel polyfermentor intestinal model (PolyFermS) for controlled ecological studies: validation and effect of pH. PLoS ONE 8(10):e77772. /10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0077772

31. Corsetti M, Costa M, Bassotti G et al (2019) First translational consensus on terminology and definitions of colonic motility in animals and humans studied by manometric and other techniques. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 169(16):559–579. /10.1038/s41575-019-0167-1

32. Parthasarathy G, Chen J, Chen X et al (2016) Relationship between microbiota of the colonic mucosa vs feces and symptoms, colonic transit, and methane production in female patients with chronic constipation. Gastroenterology 150:367–379. /10.1053/J.GASTRO.2015.10.005

33. Vandeputte D, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S et al (2016) Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut Microbiota 65:57–62. /10.1136/GUTJNL-2015-309618

34. Asnicar F, Leeming ER, Dimidi E et al (2021) Blue poo: impact of gut transit time on the gut microbiome using a novel marker. Gut Microbiota 70:1665–1674. /10.1136/GUTJNL-2020-323877

35. Tottey W, Feria-Gervasio D, Gaci N et al (2017) Colonic transit time is a driven force of the gut microbiota composition and metabolism: in vitro evidence. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 23:124–134. /10.5056/jnm16042

36. An YH, Friedman RJ (1998) Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 43:338–348. /10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199823)43:3%3c338::AID-JBM16%3e3.0.CO;2-B

37. Carniello V, Peterson BW, van der Mei HC et al (2018) Physico-chemistry from initial bacterial adhesion to surface-programmed biofilm growth. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 261:1–14. /10.1016/j.cis.2018.10.005

38. Hermansson M (1999) The DLVO theory in microbial adhesion. Colloids Surf B Biointerf 14:105–119. /10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00029-6

39. Hori K, Matsumoto S (2010) Bacterial adhesion: from mechanism to control. Biochem Eng J 48:424–434. /10.1016/J.BEJ.2009.11.014

40. Krasowska A, Sigler K (2014) How microorganisms use hydrophobicity and what does this mean for human needs? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:112. /10.3389/FCIMB.2014.00112/BIBTEX

41. Sharma S, Conrad JC (2014) Attachment from flow of Escherichia coli bacteria onto silanized glass substrates. Langmuir 30:11147–11155. /10.1021/la502313y

42. Oh JK, Yegin Y, Yang F et al (2018) The influence of surface chemistry on the kinetics and thermodynamics of bacterial adhesion. Sci Rep 8:17247. /10.1038/s41598-018-35343-1

43. Kankainen M, Paulin L, Tynkkynen S et al (2009) Comparative genomic analysis of lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human-mucus binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:17193–17198. /10.1073/pnas.0908876106

44. Sicard JF, Le Bihan G, Vogeleer P et al (2017) Interactions of intestinal bacteria with components of the intestinal mucus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:387. /10.3389/fcimb.2017.00387

45. Dunne WM (2002) Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately? Clin Microbiol Rev 15:155–166. /10.1128/CMR.15.2.155-166.2002

46. Jamal M, Ahmad W, Andleeb S et al (2018) Bacterial biofilm and associated infections. J Chin Med Assoc 81:7–11. /10.1016/j.jcma.2017.07.012

47. Zheng S, Bawazir M, Dhall A et al (2021) Implication of surface properties, bacterial motility, and hydrodynamic conditions on bacterial surface sensing and their initial adhesion. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:82. /10.3389/FBIOE.2021.643722/BIBTEX

48. Chen C, Petterson T, Illergard J et al (2019) Influence of cellulose charge on bacteria adhesion and viability to PVAm/CNF/PVAm-modified cellulose model surfaces. Biomacromol 20(5):2075–2083. /10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00297

49. Kovačević D, Pratnekar R, Torkar KG et al (2016) Influence of polyelectrolyte multilayer properties on bacterial adhesion capacity. Polymers 8(10):345. /10.3390/POLYM8100345

50. Rzhepishevska O, Hakobyan S, Ruhal R et al (2013) The surface charge of anti-bacterial coatings alters motility and biofilm architecture. Biomater Sci 1:589–602. /10.1039/C3BM00197K

51. Kao WK, Gagnon PM, Vogel JP et al (2017) Surface charge modification decreases pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence in vitro and bacterial persistence in an in vivo implant model. Laryngoscope 127(7):1655–1661. /10.1002/lary.26499

52. Guégan C, Garderes J, Le Pennec G et al (2014) Alteration of bacterial adhesion induced by the substrate stiffness. Colloids Surf B Biointerf 114:193–200. /10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.10.010

53. Lichter JA, Thompson MT, Delgadillo M et al (2008) Substrata mechanical stiffness can regulate adhesion of viable bacteria. Biomacromol 9:1571–1578. /10.1021/bm701430y

54. Song F, Ren D (2014) Stiffness of cross-linked poly(dimethylsiloxane) affects bacterial adhesion and antibiotic susceptibility of attached cells. Langmuir 30:10354–10362. /10.1021/la502029f

55. Wang Y, Guan A, Isayeva I et al (2016) Interactions of Staphylococcus aureus with ultrasoft hydrogel biomaterials. Biomaterials 95:74–85. /10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.005

56. Hou S, Gu H, Smith C et al (2011) Microtopographic patterns affect Escherichia coli biofilm formation on poly(dimethylsiloxane) surfaces. Langmuir 27:2686–2691. /10.1021/la1046194

57. Lu N, Zhang W, Weng Y et al (2016) Fabrication of PDMS surfaces with micro patterns and the effect of pattern sizes on bacteria adhesion. Food Contr 68:344–351. /10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.04.014

58. Perni S, Prokopovich P (2013) Micropatterning with conical features can control bacterial adhesion on silicone. Soft Matter 9:1844–1851. /10.1039/c2sm26828k

59. Xu LC, Siedlecki CA (2012) Submicron-textured biomaterial surface reduces staphylococcal bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Acta Biomater 8:72–81. /10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.009

60. Ge X, Leng Y, Lu X et al (2015) Bacterial responses to periodic micropillar array. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 103:384–396. /10.1002/jbm.a.35182

61. Yang M, Ding YH, Ge X et al (2015) Control of bacterial adhesion and growth on honeycomb-like patterned surfaces. Colloid Surf B 135:549–555. /10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.010

62. Kargar M, Wang J, Nain AS et al (2012) Controlling bacterial adhesion to surfaces using topographical cues: a study of the interaction of pseudomonas aeruginosa with nanofiber-textured surfaces. Soft Matter 8:10254. /10.1039/c2sm26368h

63. Biagini F, Calvigioni M, Lapomarda A et al (2020) A novel 3D in vitro model of the human gut microbiota. Sci Rep 10:21499–21510. /10.1038/s41598-020-78591-w

64. Biagini F, Calvigioni M, De Maria C et al (2022) Study of the adhesion of the human gut microbiota on electrospun structures. Bioengineering 9:96. /10.3390/bioengineering9030096

65. Verhorstert KWJ, Guler Z, de Boer L et al (2020) In vitro bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and nonabsorbable polypropylene pelvic floor implants. ACS Appl Mater Interf 12(48):53646–53653. /10.1021/acsami.0c14668

66. Yuan Y, Hays MP, Hardwidge PR et al (2017) Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. RSC Adv 7:14254–14261. /10.1039/c7ra01571b

67. De-la-Pinta I, Cobos M, Ibarretxe J et al (2019) Effect of biomaterials hydrophobicity and roughness on biofilm development. J Mater Sci Mater Med 30:77. /10.1007/S10856-019-6281-3

68. Vaudaux P, Suzuki R, Waldvogel FA et al (1984) Foreign body infection: role of fibronectin as a ligand for the adherence of Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 150:546–553. /10.1093/INFDIS/150.4.546

69. Kuusela P, Vartio T, Vuento M et al (1985) Attachment of staphylococci and streptococci on fibronectin, fibronectin fragments, and fibrinogen bound to a solid phase. Infect Immun 50:77. /10.1128/iai.50.1.77-81.1985

70. Herrmann M, Vaudaux P, Pittet D et al (1988) Fibronectin, fibrinogen, and laminin act as mediators of adherence of clinical staphylococcal isolates to foreign material. J Infect Dis 158:693–701. /10.1093/INFDIS/158.4.693

71. Etienne-Mesmin L, Chassaing B, Desvaux M et al (2019) Experimental models to study intestinal microbes–mucus interactions in health and disease. FEMS Microbiol Rev 43:457–489. /10.1093/FEMSRE/FUZ013

72. Paone P, Cani PD (2020) Mucus barrier, mucins and gut microbiota: the expected slimy partners? Gut 69:2232–2243. /10.1136/GUTJNL-2020-322260

73. Boekhorst J, Helmer Q, Kleerebezem M et al (2006) Comparative analysis of proteins with a mucus-binding domain found exclusively in lactic acid bacteria. Microbiology 152:273–280. /10.1099/MIC.0.28415-0

74. Van den Abbeele P, Roos S, Eeckhaut V et al (2012) Incorporating a mucosal environment in a dynamic gut model results in a more representative colonization by lactobacilli. Microb Biotechnol 5:106–115. /10.1111/J.1751-7915.2011.00308.X

75. Persat A, Nadell CD, Kim MK et al (2015) The mechanical world of bacteria. Cell 161:988–997. /10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.005

76. Liu Y, Tay JH (2002) The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. Water Res 36:1653–1665. /10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00379-7

77. Purevdorj B, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2002) Influence of hydrodynamics and cell signaling on the structure and behavior of pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4457–4464. /10.1128/AEM.68.9.4457-4464.2002

78. Garrett TR, Bhakoo M, Zhang Z (2008) Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces. Prog Nat Sci 18:1049–1056. /10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.04.001

79. Lecuyer S, Rusconi R, Shen Y et al (2011) Shear stress increases the residence time of adhesion of pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biophys J 100:341–350. /10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.078

80. Moreira JMR, Araújo JDP, Miranda JM et al (2014) The effects of surface properties on Escherichia coli adhesion are modulated by shear stress. Colloids Surf B Biointerf 123:1–7. /10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.08.016

81. Tilles AW, Baskaran H, Roy P et al (2001) Effects of oxygenation and flow on the viability and function of rat hepatocytes cocultured in a microchannel flat-plate bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 73:379–389. /10.1002/bit.1071

82. Rusconi R, Lecuyer S, Guglielmini L et al (2010) Laminar flow around corners triggers the formation of biofilm streamers. J R Soc Interf 7:1293–1299. /10.1098/rsif.2010.0096

83. Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD et al (1999) Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. Biotechnol Bioeng 65:83–92. /10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19991005)65:1%3c83::AID-BIT10%3e3.0.CO;2-B

84. Kim MK, Drescher K, Shun Pak O et al (2014) Filaments in curved streamlines: rapid formation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm streamers. New J Phys 16:065024. /10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/065024

85. Thomen P, Robert J, Monmeyran A et al (2017) Bacterial biofilm under flow: first a physical struggle to stay, then a matter of breathing. PLoS ONE 12:e0175197. /10.1371/journal.pone.0175197

86. Siddiqui S, Chandrasekaran A, Lin N et al (2019) Microfluidic shear assay to distinguish between bacterial adhesion and attachment strength on stiffness-tunable silicone substrates. Langmuir 35:8840–8849. /10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00803

87. Li ZJ, Mohamed N, Ross JM (2000) Shear stress affects the kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to collagen. Biotechnol Prog 16:1086–1090. /10.1021/bp000117r

88. Vis MAM, Ito K, Hofmann S (2020) Impact of culture medium on cellular interactions in in vitro co-culture systems. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:911. /10.3389/FBIOE.2020.00911/BIBTEX

89. Zhu S, Ehnert S, Rouß M et al (2018) From the clinical problem to the basic research-co-culture models of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Int J Mol Sci 19:2284. /10.3390/ijms19082284

90. Jones GL, Motta A, Marshall MJ et al (2009) Osteoblast: osteoclast co-cultures on silk fibroin, chitosan and PLLA films. Biomaterials 30:5376–5384. /10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.028

91. Lavender MD, Pang Z, Wallace CS et al (2005) A system for the direct co-culture of endothelium on smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 26:4642–4653. /10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.045

92. Goers L, Freemont P, Polizzi KM (2014) Co-culture systems and technologies: taking synthetic biology to the next level. J R Soc Interf 11:20140065. /10.1098/rsif.2014.0065

93. Chung S, Sudo R, Mack PJ et al (2009) Cell migration into scaffolds under co-culture conditions in a microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 9:269–275. /10.1039/B807585A

94. Katagiri W, Sakaguchi K, Kawai T et al (2017) A defined mix of cytokines mimics conditioned medium from cultures of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and elicits bone regeneration. Cell Prolif 50:e12333. /10.1111/cpr.12333

95. Bidarra SJ, Barrias CC, Barbosa MA et al (2011) Phenotypic and proliferative modulation of human mesenchymal stem cells via crosstalk with endothelial cells. Stem Cell Res 7:186–197. /10.1016/j.scr.2011.05.006

96. Klitgord N, Segrè D (2010) Environments that induce synthetic microbial ecosystems. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1001002. /10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001002

97. Shin W, Wu A, Massidda MW et al (2019) A robust longitudinal co-culture of obligate anaerobic gut microbiome with human intestinal epithelium in an anoxic-oxic interface-on-a-chip. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:13. /10.3389/fbioe.2019.00013

98. Yoshimura Y, Kikuiri T, Hasegawa T et al (2017) How much medium do you use for cell culture? Medium volume influences mineralization and osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Mol Med Rep 16:429–434. /10.3892/MMR.2017.6611/HTML

99. Shimomura A, Iizuka-Kogo A, Yamamoto N et al (2016) A lower volume culture method for obtaining a larger yield of neuron-like cells from mesenchymal stem cells. Med Mol Morphol 49:119–126. /10.1007/s00795-015-0131-2

100. Simão VA, Evangelista-Ribeiro CP, Brand H et al (2019) Metabolic and proliferation evaluation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASC) in different culture medium volumes: standardization of static culture. Biologicals 62:93–101. /10.1016/J.BIOLOGICALS.2019.08.006

101. Krüger-Genge A, Fuhrmann R, Jung F et al (2015) Morphology of primary human venous endothelial cell cultures before and after culture medium exchange. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 61:151–156. /10.3233/CH-151992

102. Büntemeyer H, Wallerius C, Lehmann J (1992) Optimal medium use for continuous high density perfusion processes. Cytotechnology 9:59–67. /10.1007/BF02521732

103. Chen G, Gulbranson DR, Hou Z et al (2011) Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nat Methods 85(8):424–429. /10.1038/nmeth.1593

104. Shinohara M, Choi H, Ibuki M et al (2019) Endodermal differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells using simple dialysis culture system in suspension culture. Regen Ther 12:14–19. /10.1016/J.RETH.2019.05.004

105. Côme J, Nissan X, Aubry L et al (2008) Improvement of culture conditions of human embryoid bodies using a controlled perfused and dialyzed bioreactor system. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 14:289–298. /10.1089/TEN.TEC.2008.0029

106. Stieb M, Schink B (1987) Cultivation of syntrophic anaerobic bacteria in membrane-separated culture devices. FEMS Microbiol Lett 45:71–76. /10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02341.x

107. Ohno M, Okano I, Watsuji T et al (1999) Establishing the independent culture of a strictly symbiotic bacterium symbiobacterium thermophilum from its supporting bacillus strain. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 63(6):1083–1090. /10.1271/bbb.63.1083

108. Kapoore RV, Padmaperuma G, Maneein S et al (2022) Co-culturing microbial consortia: approaches for applications in biomanufacturing and bioprocessing. Crit Rev Biotechnol 42:46–72. /10.1080/07388551.2021.1921691

109. Shin W, Kim HJ (2018) Intestinal barrier dysfunction orchestrates the onset of inflammatory host–microbiome cross-talk in a human gut inflammation-on-a-chip. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E10539–E10547. /10.1073/pnas.1810819115

110. Flint HJ (2012) The impact of nutrition on the human microbiome. Nutr Rev 70:S10–S13. /10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00499.x

111. Louis P, Hold GL, Flint HJ (2014) The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:661–672. /10.1038/nrmicro3344

112. Bohn T, Carriere F, Day L et al (2018) Correlation between in vitro and in vivo data on food digestion. What can we predict with static in vitro digestion models? Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58:2239–2261. /10.1080/10408398.2017.1315362

113. Sarbini SR, Kolida S, Naeye T et al (2011) In vitro fermentation of linear and α-1,2-branched dextrans by the human fecal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(15):5307–5315. /10.1128/AEM.02568-10

114. Minekus M, Alminger M, Alvito P et al (2014) A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus. Food Funct 5:1113–1124. /10.1039/C3FO60702J

115. Brodkorb A, Egger L, Alminger M et al (2019) INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion. Nat Protoc 14:991–1014. /10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1

116. Pérez-Burillo S, Molino S, Navajas-Porras B et al (2021) An in vitro batch fermentation protocol for studying the contribution of food to gut microbiota composition and functionality. Nat Protoc 16:3186–3209. /10.1038/s41596-021-00537-x

117. Ji H, Hu J, Zuo S et al (2021) In vitro gastrointestinal digestion and fermentation models and their applications in food carbohydrates. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 62(19):5349–5371. /10.1080/10408398.2021.1884841

118. Dupont D, Alric M, Blanquet-Diot S et al (2019) Can dynamic in vitro digestion systems mimic the physiological reality? Crit Rev Food Sci 59(10):1546–1562. /10.1080/10408398.2017.1421900

119. Liu Z, Cichocki N, Hübschmann T et al (2019) Neutral mechanisms and niche differentiation in steady-state insular microbial communities revealed by single cell analysis. Environ Microbiol 21:164–181. /10.1111/1462-2920.14437

120. Firrman J, Liu L, Mahalak K et al (2021) Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota cultured in vitro using a single colon versus a 3-stage colon experimental design. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:3353–3367. /10.1007/S00253-021-11241-X

121. Blanquet-Diot S, Denis S, Chalancon S et al (2012) Use of artificial digestive systems to investigate the biopharmaceutical factors influencing the survival of probiotic yeast during gastrointestinal transit in humans. Pharm Res 29:1444–1453. /10.1007/S11095-011-0620-5

122. Cordonnier C, Thévenot J, Etienne-Mesmin L et al (2015) Dynamic in vitro models of the human gastrointestinal tract as relevant tools to assess the survival of probiotic strains and their interactions with gut microbiota. Microorganisms 3:725. /10.3390/MICROORGANISMS3040725

123. Thévenot J, Etienne-Mesmin L, Denis S et al (2013) Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 survival in an in vitro model of the human large intestine and interactions with probiotic yeasts and resident microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:1058–1064. /10.1128/AEM.03303-12

124. Thévenot J, Cordonnier C, Rougeron A et al (2015) Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection has donor-dependent effect on human gut microbiota and may be antagonized by probiotic yeast during interaction with Peyer’s patches. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:9097–9110. /10.1007/S00253-015-6704-0

125. Gibson GR, Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT (1988) Use of a three-stage continuous culture system to study the effect of mucin on dissimilatory sulfate reduction and methanogenesis by mixed populations of human gut bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:2750–2755. /10.1128/aem.54.11.2750-2755.1988

126. Costabile A, Walton GE, Tzortzis G et al (2015) Effects of orange juice formulation on prebiotic functionality using an in vitro colonic model system. PLoS ONE 10:e0121955. /10.1371/journal.pone.0121955

127. Healey G, Murphy R, Butts C et al (2017) Variability in gut microbiota response to an inulin-type fructan prebiotic within an in vitro three-stage continuous colonic model system. Bioact Carbohydrates Diet Fibre 11:26–37. /10.1016/j.bcdf.2017.07.001

128. Minekus M, Marteau P, Havenaar R et al (1995) A multicompartmental dynamic computer-controlled model simulating the stomach and small-intestine. Atla-Altern Lab Anim 23(2):197–209. /10.1177/026119299502300205

129. Verwei M, Minekus M, Zeijdner E et al (2016) Evaluation of two dynamic in vitro models simulating fasted and fed state conditions in the upper gastrointestinal tract (TIM-1 and tiny-TIM) for investigating the bioaccessibility of pharmaceutical compounds from oral dosage forms. Int J Pharm 498:178–186. /10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2015.11.048

130. Bellmann S, Lelieveld J, Gorissen T et al (2016) Development of an advanced in vitro model of the stomach and its evaluation versus human gastric physiology. Food Res Int 88:191–198. /10.1016/J.FOODRES.2016.01.030

131. Venema K (2015) The TNO in vitro model of the colon (TIM-2). In: Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I, et al (Eds.), The impact of food bioactives on health. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 293–304. /10.1007/978-3-319-16104-4_26

132. Cieplak T, Wiese M, Nielsen S et al (2018) The smallest intestine (TSI)—a low volume in vitro model of the small intestine with increased throughput. Fems Microbiol Lett 365(21):231. /10.1093/FEMSLE/FNY231

133. Macfarlane S, Dillon J (2007) Microbial biofilms in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol 102:1187–1196. /10.1111/J.1365-2672.2007.03287.X

134. Zihler A, Gagnon M, Chassard C et al (2011) Protective effect of probiotics on Salmonella infectivity assessed with combined in vitro gut fermentation-cellular models. BMC Microbiol 11:264. /10.1186/1471-2180-11-264

135. Li S, Abdulkadir N, Schattenberg F et al (2022) Stabilizing microbial communities by looped mass transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci 119:e2117814119. /10.1073/pnas.2117814119

136. Thuenemann EC, Mandalari G, Rich GT et al (2015) Dynamic gastric model (DGM). In: Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I, et al (Eds.), The impact of food bioactives on health. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 47–59. /10.1007/978-3-319-16104-4_6

137. Vardakou M, Mercuri A, Barker SA et al (2011) Achieving antral grinding forces in biorelevant in vitro models: comparing the USP dissolution apparatus II and the dynamic gastric model with human in vivo data. AAPS PharmSciTech 12(2):620–626. /10.1208/s12249-011-9616-z

138. Mercuri A, Lo Curto A, Wickham MSJ et al (2008) Dynamic gastric model (DGM): a novel in vitro apparatus to assess the impact of gastric digestion on the droplet size of self-emulsifying drug-delivery systems. J Pharm Pharmacol 60:4

139. O’donnell MM, Rea MC, Shanahan F et al (2018) The use of a mini-bioreactor fermentation system as a reproducible, high-throughput ex vivo batch model of the distal colon. Front Microbiol 9:1844. /10.3389/fmicb.2018.01844

140. McDonald JA, Schroeter K, Fuentes S et al (2013) Evaluation of microbial community reproducibility, stability and composition in a human distal gut chemostat model. J Microbiol Methods 95:167–174. /10.1016/J.MIMET.2013.08.008

141. McDonald JA, Fuentes S, Schroeter K et al (2015) Simulating distal gut mucosal and luminal communities using packed-column biofilm reactors and an in vitro chemostat model. J Microbiol Methods 108:36–44. /10.1016/J.MIMET.2014.11.007

142. Molly K, Vande Woestyne M, Verstraete W (1993) Development of a 5-step multi-chamber reactor as a simulation of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39:254–258. /10.1007/BF00228615

143. Van den Abbeele P, Grootaert C, Marzorati M et al (2010) Microbial community development in a dynamic gut model is reproducible, colon region specific, and selective for Bacteroidetes and Clostridium cluster IX. Appl Environ Microb 76(15):5237–5246. /10.1128/Aem.00759-10

144. Van de Wiele T, Van den Abbeele P, Ossieur W et al (2015) The simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (SHIME®). In: Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I, et al (Eds.), The impact of food bioactives on health. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 305–317. /10.1007/978-3-319-16104-4_27

145. Wang M, Wichienchot S, He X et al (2019) In vitro colonic fermentation of dietary fibers: fermentation rate, short-chain fatty acid production and changes in microbiota. Trends Food Sci Technol 88:1–9. /10.1016/J.TIFS.2019.03.005

146. Barroso E, Cueva C, Peláez C et al (2015) Development of human colonic microbiota in the computer-controlled dynamic SIMulator of the gastroIntestinal tract SIMGI. LWT - Food Sci Technol 61:283–289. /10.1016/J.LWT.2014.12.014

147. Poeker SA, Geirnaert A, Berchtold L et al (2018) Understanding the prebiotic potential of different dietary fibers using an in vitro continuous adult fermentation model (PolyFermS). Sci Rep 8:4318. /10.1038/s41598-018-22438-y

148. Burmeister A, Grünberger A (2020) Microfluidic cultivation and analysis tools for interaction studies of microbial co-cultures. Curr Opin Biotechnol 62:106–115. /10.1016/j.copbio.2019.09.001

149. Tan HY, Toh YC (2020) What can microfluidics do for human microbiome research? Biomicrofluidics 14:51303. /10.1063/5.0012185

150. Trujillo-de Santiago G, Lobo-Zegers MJ, Montes-Fonseca SL et al (2018) Gut-microbiota-on-a-chip: an enabling field for physiological research. Microphysiol Syst 2:7 /10.21037/mps.2018.09.01

151. von Martels JZH, Sadaghian Sadabad M, Bourgonje AR et al (2017) The role of gut microbiota in health and disease: in vitro modeling of host-microbe interactions at the aerobe-anaerobe interphase of the human gut. Anaerobe 44:3–12. /10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.01.001

152. Roupar D, Berni P, Martins JT et al (2021) Bioengineering approaches to simulate human colon microbiome ecosystem. Trends Food Sci Technol 112:808–822. /10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.035

153. Bein A, Shin W, Jalili-Firoozinezhad S et al (2018) Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip models of human intestine. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(4):659–668. /10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.010

154. Bartfeld S (2016) Modeling infectious diseases and host-microbe interactions in gastrointestinal organoids. Dev Biol 420:262–270. /10.1016/J.YDBIO.2016.09.014

155. Maier E, Anderson RC, Altermann E et al (2018) Live Faecalibacterium prausnitzii induces greater TLR2 and TLR2/6 activation than the dead bacterium in an apical anaerobic co-culture system. Cell Microbiol 20(2):e12805. /10.1111/CMI.12805

156. Sadaghian Sadabad M, von Martels JZH, Khan MT et al (2016) A simple coculture system shows mutualism between anaerobic faecalibacteria and epithelial Caco-2 cells. Sci Rep 5:17906. /10.1038/srep17906

157. Marzorati M, Vanhoecke B, De Ryck T et al (2014) The HMI™ module: a new tool to study the host-microbiota interaction in the human gastrointestinal tract in vitro. BMC Microbiol 14:133. /10.1186/1471-2180-14-133

158. Shah P, Fritz JV, Glaab E et al (2016) A microfluidics-based in vitro model of the gastrointestinal human-microbe interface. Nat Commun 7:1–15. /10.1038/ncomms11535

159. Parlesak A, Haller D, Brinz S et al (2004) Modulation of cytokine release by differentiated CACO-2 cells in a compartmentalized coculture model with mononuclear leucocytes and nonpathogenic bacteria. Scand J Immunol 60(5):477–485. /10.1111/J.0300-9475.2004.01495.X

160. Ulluwishewa D, Anderson RC, Young W et al (2015) Live Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in an apical anaerobic model of the intestinal epithelial barrier. Cell Microbiol 17(2):226–240. /10.1111/cmi.12360

161. Ramadan Q, Zourob M (2020) Organ-on-a-chip engineering: toward bridging the gap between lab and industry. Biomicrofluidics 14:041501. /10.1063/5.0011583

162. Kim HJ, Huh D, Hamilton G et al (2012) Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. Lab Chip 12:2165. /10.1039/c2lc40074j

163. Jalili-Firoozinezhad S, Gazzaniga FS, Calamari EL et al (2019) A complex human gut microbiome cultured in an anaerobic intestine-on-a-chip. Nat Biomed Eng 3:520–531. /10.1038/s41551-019-0397-0

164. Pajoumshariati SR, Azizi M, Zhang SY et al (2018) A microfluidic-based model for spatially constrained culture of intestinal microbiota. Adv Funct Mater 28(48):1805568. /10.1002/adfm.201805568

165. Taeuber S, Schmitz J, Bloebaum L et al (2021) How to perform a microfluidic cultivation experiment-a guideline to success. Biosensors 11(12):485. /10.3390/BIOS11120485

166. Hassanpourfard M, Ghosh R, Thundat T et al (2016) Dynamics of bacterial streamers induced clogging in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 16:4091–4096. /10.1039/C6LC01055E

167. Skelley AM, Voldman J (2008) An active bubble trap and debubbler for microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 8:1733–1737. /10.1039/B807037G

168. Zheng W, Wang Z, Zhang W et al (2010) A simple PDMS-based microfluidic channel design that removes bubbles for long-term on-chip culture of mammalian cells. Lab Chip 10:2906–2910. /10.1039/C005274D

169. Bartfeld S, Bayram T, van de Wetering M et al (2015) In vitro expansion of human gastric epithelial stem cells and their responses to bacterial infection. Gastroenterology 148:126-136.e6. /10.1053/J.GASTRO.2014.09.042

170. McCracken KW, Catá EM, Crawford CM et al (2014) Modelling human development and disease in pluripotent stem-cell-derived gastric organoids. Nature 516:400–404. /10.1038/NATURE13863

171. Leslie JL, Huang S, Opp JS et al (2015) Persistence and toxin production by Clostridium difficile within human intestinal organoids result in disruption of epithelial paracellular barrier function. Infect Immun 83(1):138–145. /10.1128/Iai.02561-14

172. Hill DR, Huang S, Nagy MS et al (2017) Bacterial colonization stimulates a complex physiological response in the immature human intestinal epithelium. eLife 6:e29132. /10.7554/ELIFE.29132

173. Williamson IA, Arnold JW, Samsa LA et al (2018) A high-throughput organoid microinjection platform to study gastrointestinal microbiota and luminal physiology. Cell Mol Gastroenter 6(3):301–319. /10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.05.004

174. Co JY, Margalef-Catala M, Li XN et al (2019) Controlling epithelial polarity: a human enteroid model for host-pathogen interactions. Cell Rep 26(9):2509–2520. /10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.108

175. Ettayebi K, Crawford SE, Murakami K et al (2016) Replication of human noroviruses in stem cell-derived human enteroids. Science 353:1387–1393. /10.1126/SCIENCE.AAF5211

176. VanDussen KL, Marinshaw JM, Shaikh N et al (2015) Development of an enhanced human gastrointestinal epithelial culture system to facilitate patient-based assays. Gut 64:911–920. /10.1136/GUTJNL-2013-306651

177. Kim R, Attayek PJ, Wang Y et al (2019) An in vitro intestinal platform with a self-sustaining oxygen gradient to study the human gut/microbiome interface. Biofabrication 12:015006. /10.1088/1758-5090/ab446e

178. Fofanova TY, Stewart CJ, Auchtung JM et al (2019) A novel human enteroid-anaerobe co-culture system to study microbial-host interaction under physiological hypoxia. bioRxiv. /10.1101/555755

179. Eain MMG, Baginska J, Greenhalgh K et al (2017) Engineering solutions for representative models of the gastrointestinal human-microbe interface. Engineering 3(1):60–65. /10.1016/J.Eng.2017.01.011